adobe acrobat pro 2017 perpetual license

Get something comparable and probably save some money. If you can't get settled, kick Adobe to the curb and tell them to eat a 40 gallon bag of cocks. At the end of the day, you're compliant and if they try to do anything about it, the burden of proof is on them to prove that the perpetual licensing isn't good enough for users that are licensed and compliant, which they wouldn't be able to do. If you have to tell them you only have 70 users and leave it at that in order for them to get off your back, I would go that route. If there was nothing in either product's EULA that states that a specific license type is required for all users in the environment if there is a terminal server, then all that matters is that your users are licensed with an appropriate license for their use.Īll that is relevant is the 70 users. 'Sorry, you need 150 licenses because we can't be certain that you have only 140 users'. That's like them questioning your user count in general. It doesn't matter that they can't monitor how many users are or aren't using the terminal server. If you have 70 users that need different licensing than you have, that's one thing, but your other 70 users are compliant.

They cannot force you to purchase more licensing than you need under the EULA. If you have 140 users and all have perpetual licensing, they shouldn't even be contacting you regarding licensing unless they are auditing the user count itself. I'm curious to know why they suddenly are questioning your compliance.

Adobe acrobat pro 2017 perpetual license